APP STORE tm(?)– Appsolutely Astonishing!

Posted by | May 02, 2011 | General | No Comments

As if the URBAN HOMESTEADING case weren’t exciting enough, here’s another prominent genericness battle for us all to watch . . .

Last Friday’s poll on CNET‘s CRAVE blog asked, “What’s your favorite app store?”  Apple’s IOS won 50% of the vote, beating out its closest competitor, the Android Market, which garnered only 41%.  Nonetheless, citing a study performed by The Netherlands app store market analysis firm Distimo, CNET reports that the Android Market soon is expected to surpass Apple’s App Store in popularity, perhaps even within a few months.  Meanwhile, elsewhere in California, a lawsuit ensues between Apple and Amazon over use of APP STORE mark (APP STORE trademark; really?).  Yes, really.  Apple claims APP STORE is a mark.  Amazon claims APP STORE is a generic term.  Thus, the battle begins.

On March 16, 2011, Apple filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against alleging infringement, dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition.  Predictably, Apple seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to enjoin (prevent) Amazon from using its APP STORE mark.

Apple’s lawsuit claims:

[framed_box]1. Apple is a market leading computer hardware, software, and mobile computing technology and services company.  Its APP STORE mobile software download service has transformed the way that mobile device users customize and expand the functionality of their devices.  Apple, long renowned for its innovation and product design, introduced the APP STORE service and coined the APP STORE mark just over two and a half years ago.  In that short period of time, the service has experienced phenomenal growth and success, and the service is now used by over 160 million consumers worldwide who have downloaded more than 10 billion software programs. [/framed_box]

Apple’s lawyers clearly did not craft the language on Apple’s App Store homepage, which refers to “mobile software downloads” time and again as “apps” (even though it does use uppercase letters in its references to the App Store, treating that as a mark).

What I fail to understand is this:  How can a company that repeatedly uses the term “app” generically on its website to describe “mobile software downloads” then claim that APP STORE has acquired secondary meaning for a retail store selling apps?  If “app” is generic; how could APP STORE not be?  I know that there are (rare) occasions on which the combination of two otherwise generic terms can create a uniquely protectable mark, but APP STORE?!  Apple should know that coining a term doesn’t make it a protectable mark.  In fact, coined terms belonging to inventors more often fall prey to genericide than do other marks, because the mark becomes the name of the object/service, losing any brand significance it once possessed.

Amazon filed an Answer (and counterclaim) to Apple’s suit last Wednesday, denying that Apple “coined the APP STORE mark,” and asserting that Amazon’s generic use of the term “app store” is lawful.  Amazon counterclaims against Apple for declaratory judgment that its use of “app store” is non-infringing and seeking attorneys’ fees and expenses under the exceptional case provisions of 15 U.S.C. 1117.

I presume this case will settle, as most cases do.  In the unlikely event that this case makes it through trial, it will be interesting to see how big a bite Amazon takes out of Apple.

It is well established in trademark law that one cannot turn a generic term into a mark.  In sharp contrast, however, marks can become generic.  It is as important to discuss new marks with your counsel prior to adoption as it is to ensure proper usage of your marks to prevent them from becoming generic.

About Lara

Lara Pearson is a trademark attorney with Exemplar, where she also serves as the firm's Sustainability Steward. Lara's legal practice focuses on trademark and copyright law, including: intellectual property audits; trademark search & clearance; trademark and copyright registration & maintenance; intellectual property transfers; transactional work; and dispute resolution, including litigation when necessary. Lara primarily represents other social enterprises -- those leveraging their businesses and brands as catalysts for positive social and environmental change. Such businesses engage in CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) to have a positive "triple bottom line" of people, planet and profit. As Exemplar's Sustainability Steward, Lara works with others in her law firm to measure and reduce the firm's carbon emissions and encourage engagement in social responsibility initiatives, including pro bono legal work and volunteering. Lara is a proud member of the Social Venture Network. Brand Geek is a member of 1% for the Planet and a Certified B Corporation, whose Incline Village office is certified under the regional Keep the Sierra Green program. Exemplar Companies is the most innovative professional services firm in the New Economy. Our unique, diversified expertise spans the disciplines of corporate law, business advisory, and capital/investment banking to better meet the needs of our high-potential customers. We have assembled a comprehensive suite of service to meet the complex issues facing companies in today’s challenging business environment. Our unique, holistic approach ensures the growth and success – and greatly increases the competitive advantage - of our customers. The Exemplar team is comprised of knowledgeable, highly skilled experts in a wide range of industries and disciplines. They work closely with our customers to provide trusted advice, incomparable support, expert guidance and the ultimate competitive advantage as they accelerate their businesses and position themselves to transform industries.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.